# Contact Medicine NAD: Reach the NAD+ Editorial Desk

> Contact Medicine NAD, an independent NAD+ research digest. Editorial correspondence and corrections only — no medical advice, no products, no clinical services.

Editorial questions, source suggestions and corrections — the NAD+ literature is large, and we welcome pointers to studies we should add.

## Editorial Correspondence

Medicine NAD is an editorial project covering the NAD+ research literature. Use the form to send corrections, point us to peer-reviewed studies worth adding, or ask about how a claim on this site is sourced. We read every message and update pages when a citation warrants it.

We cannot answer requests for medical advice, dosing guidance, or product recommendations, and we do not respond to commercial or vendor inquiries. This site does not sell NAD+, NMN, NR, or any supplement, and it does not provide clinical or telehealth services. The "medicine" in our name is the register of a reference monograph, not an offer of care. For anything concerning your health, consult a qualified clinician.

## What to Expect

Correspondence about the published research — a study we missed, a number that looks off, a citation that needs a better link — is exactly what this desk is for. If you flag an error with a source, we will check it against the literature and correct the record. What we will not do is recommend a product, a dose, or a course of action; that lies outside an editorial digest of the science.

The NAD+ field moves quickly, and new precursor trials and reviews appear regularly. If you work in the area and publish something relevant — a randomized trial, a pharmacokinetic study, a mechanism paper — a pointer to the DOI is genuinely useful, and the kind of message most likely to change a page here.

## A Note on Scope

This contact channel is editorial, not clinical. We cannot interpret your lab results, advise on whether to take a precursor, or comment on a specific product's quality. Those questions belong with a clinician or, for product-quality matters, with the manufacturer and the relevant regulator. What we can do is make sure the science on these pages is accurate, current, and faithfully cited — and your corrections help us do exactly that.

---

A ruled reading of the NAD+ literature — the coenzyme kept distinct from its precursors, the measured separated from the unproven; not a clinic, not a vendor, not a prescription.